Published: 13-12-2019

121 writers online

Important: This essay is not a finished work, it is only an outline that needs refinement and formatting.
If you want to pay for essay for unique writing The Enforcement of the DREAM ACT in the Trump Administration, just click Order button. We will write a custom essay on The Enforcement of the DREAM ACT in the Trump Administration specifically for you!

The Enforcement of the DREAM ACT in the Trump Administration

The goal and significance of DACA is to give relief from deportation particularly to eligible youth immigrants who came or rather entered the United States when they had been youngsters (Dilckerson, 2018). Thus, DACA protects and makes it possible for eligibility for work permits of young undocumented immigrants and entitlement to a two-year renewable deferral action on deportation (Dilckerson, 2018).


DACA was established following the acknowledgment that the number of “Dreamer” scholars in America was constantly increasing, and therefore the require to permit and defend some people under restrictive situations (Dilckerson, 2018). Primarily, DACA sought to safeguard the undocumented youth immigrants by obtaining rid of unlawful deportation of native-born citizens of the United States, specifically these with great behavior (Yamiche Alcindor, 2017).

As a result, the DREAM Act was enforced. The bill aimed at offering a legal position to young unauthorized settlers who had come to the U.S with no legal permission. Due to the speedy enhance of illegal immigrant students in the U.S, the DREAM Act bill supplied protection and administration relief to the rising population of unauthorized immigrants (Dilckerson, 2018). Hence, via the Dream Act, the undocumented immigrants had been assured of permanent residency in the United States upon meeting particular qualifications and requirements as enshrined by the American Congress in 2007 with regards to DACA (Yamiche Alcindor, 2017).

Impacts of Trump Administration’s Policy on Young Undocumented Immigrants

The selection of president Donald Trump with regards to terminating of DACA plan will not only deprive the government revenues of DACA recipients but impact the huge population of unauthorized immigrants in the United States as nicely (Schwartz, 2016). This is since these young folks, usually referred to as “Dreamers” who have been residents of the United States for fairly a long period of time and even attended school and functions there, makes contributions to the economy as effectively (Schwartz, 2016).

As a result, Trump’s administration’s policy with regards to the undocumented immigrants poses a lot of danger and uncertain future growth indices of the U.S economy as ending of DACA system will deprive the nation of valued workers (Wides-Mun~oz, 2018). Consequently, the United States will drop tax revenue, and therefore worsening government finances.

For instance, according to the report released by the National Academy in 2016, it was revealed that young adults born in the United States by immigrant parents have a optimistic net influence to America’s economy (Gonzales, 2016). This is due to the fact a high population of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S is properly equipped with great educational backgrounds, and hence they are compensated very in their various workstations. As a result, on a per capita basis, highly educated undocumented immigrants pay a lot more in taxes. As a outcome, the choice of Trump’s administration regarding deporting undocumented immigrants will affect the finances of the U.S. government major to a net drain of its economy (Schwartz, 2016).

In addition, Trump’s administration policy on young undocumented immigrants is probably to waste taxpayer dollars. This is due to the fact placing an end to DACA program will not aid locate, deport hazardous criminals and increase border safety, but rather hurt the U.S economy and waste taxpayer dollars on deportation (Schwartz, 2016). This is due to the truth that, Trump’s administration rhetoric on immigrants upholds the position that native-born citizens are more likely to commit crimes. Nevertheless, this presumption is incorrect as it not supported by any information.

For that reason, it is important to safeguard the rights of good behavior students, apprentices and other different learners who are earning their education, rather than prosecuting them unlawfully. As an alternative, emphasis should be put on prosecuting convicted criminals who would otherwise pose danger to the community. Thus, the decision of ending DACA system is economically imprudent as there will be a lot of wastage of taxpayer dollars on implementing counterproductive immigration enforcement. As an alternative, these finances need to be employed on different productive government projects, hence strengthening the country’s economy (Schwartz, 2016).

Also, Trump’s administration policy on young undocumented immigrants has an impact on U.S employers (Schwartz, 2016). The administration policy offers liberty to U.S employers to work with DACA recipients with valid Employment Authorization Documents (EAD). Even so, upon the expiry of Employment Authorization Documents, the employers are not permitted to continue employing DACA recipients as it is unlawful (Gonzales, 2016). This means termination of their employment. Nonetheless, DACA recipients are allowed to apply for a renewal of an EAD as soon as feasible. Nevertheless, they are not allowed to work if their current EAD expires, even if they are waiting for an extension of application approval (Gonzales, 2016).

Finally, the immigration guiding principles of President Donald Trump’s administration is characterized by suffrage and illegal detention of the Native-American citizens and unauthorized immigrant in the U.S. For instance, according to report released by U.S Division of Homeland Safety on the 5th of December 2017, a lot of immigration arrests of people with no criminal conviction has been on the rise nearly tripled compared to the same period in 2016 (Gonzales, 2016). A large number of people becoming deported demonstrates the violation of the rights of long-term immigrants with the sturdy U.S as they are not offered a fair and individualized hearing just before deportation (Schwartz, 2016).
Calculate your price

Related Samples

What are you waiting for?

No matter what type of essay you need, we’ll get it written, so let’s get started.


This material is not unique

Our experts help you to write plagiarism-free paper

Get plagiarism-free paper

Get plagiarism-free paper

Would you like to get an example of this paper?

Please write down your email to receive it right away

Receive paper

Thanks for subscribing!