Close

SPECIAL OFFER FOR OUR CLIENTS! CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: FIRST5

Published: 01-10-2019

121 writers online

Disclaimer: This essay is not an example of the work done by the EssayPay© service. Samples of our experts work can be found here. All opinions and conclusions belong to the authors, who sent us this essay.
If you want to pay for essay for unique writing The Irony in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, just click Order button. We will write a custom essay on The Irony in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment specifically for you!

The Irony in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment

The primary conflict in Crime and Punishment is the internal development of Raskolnikov’s character. In Raskolnikov’s mind are two contrasting personalities, each and every demanding manage more than him. One particular side, brought out by poverty and egoism, is the murderer who kills the pawnbroker. The other side, inspired by the enjoy of others and his inner goodness, is his benevolent conscience which desires to help those about him. The conflict rages on throughout the entire novel, and in the end Raskolnikov’s good side wins over as he accepts his guilt, admits to his wrongness, and turns his life over to Sonia and God. In Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky attempts to portray the complexity of Raskolnikov’s mental evolution. A principal car for this activity is his use of the literary device irony. Irony is the contrast amongst what is said and what is meant, or what takes place and what is anticipated to come about. In verbal irony, characters say the opposite of what they mean. In situational irony, the unexpected takes place. Crime and Punishment is abundant with each verbal and situational irony, as it instigates the essential turning points of Raskolnikov’s improvement, and thus let Dostoevsky to convey his message that even a murderer can be reformed and purified by means of guilt and the unconditional love of other individuals.

Irony is first utilized in the ramblings of Marmeladov. Marmeledov says, “Crucify me oh judge…He is the One…He will forgive my Sonia.” This statement is ironic, since Marmeladov, despite being a drunk, introduces a major Christian message of the novel. He also explains the irony of his daughter Sonia. Although she is a prostitute, some thing regarded rather base, she will be “forgiven by God” for she is a really holy particular person and the epitome of innocence and purity in the novel. These two ideas are important to the transformation of Raskolnikov later in the novel. They also convey Dostoevsky’s sturdy belief in Christianity, and they reveal his worth method towards particular humans.

Situational irony first becomes a essential device in Raskolnikov’s plot to murder the pawnbroker. Raskolnikov vacillates over his selection. 1 minute he tells himself, “I would like to try a factor like that.” Following saying this, he turns around and says, “I knew I could never bring myself to it.” Raskolnikov is clearly wavering between regardless of whether or not to commit the murder. However, his indecisiveness is eliminated by the occurrence of two ironic events. 1st, instantly following his dream when he states, “My God! I couldn’t bring myself to do it…I couldn’t do it…I couldn’t do it!” he overhears Lizaveta saying, “At seven o’clock tomorrow…I’ll come (to the apartment)” This ironic twist of fate makes the murder of the pawnbroker the next day best, as her sister Lizaveta would be away at seven o’ clock, and the “old lady would be left alone.” Raskolnikov decides this is a golden chance, revealing a substantial modify of attitude in Raskolnikov, beginning the development of his dark character. Subsequent, Raskolnikov overhears a man at the bar say, “I could kill that damned old lady and make off with her income, I assure you, with out the faintest conscience-prick.” This ironic statement startles Raskolnikov, as he had “the very exact same concept.” It supplies another justification for the murder, as Raskolnikov believes the crime will benefit other people. This ironic occasion is crucial to Raskolnikov’s improvement as it has “an immense influence on him in his later action.” These ironic events enable Raskolnikov to commit the murder of the pawnbroker and commence his lengthy journey of conversion.

Irony is apparent in the early stages of Raskolnikov’s guilt. Very first, situational irony occurs when Raskolnikov is in the pawnbroker’s apartment, and he hears an individual knock on the door and say, “Are they asleep or are they murdered?” This arouses panic in Raskolnikov and instigates his guilt. A similar instance occurs when Raskolnikov receives a “summons to the police workplace.” Right away Raskolnikov panics and suffers from intense guilt. He does not endure remorse since he believes his murder was wrong, but due to the fact he did not commit it completely. The summons is ironic because it is not for the murder but since Raskolnikov is a “fine bird” who did not pay debts. When Raskolnikov discovers this, he is overcome with relief and reassurance that his murder was justified. This ironic occasion reveals the intense mental disorder of Raskolnikov. Much more importantly, the guilt Raskolnikov suffers is suffered by his egotistical, cold side, and the guilt is eliminated when he realizes he is not caught. This form of guilt reoccurs throughout the book until the extremely finish, supporting Dostoevsky’s message that guilt is not constructive till the benevolent side feels it for becoming wrong.

Dostoevsky utilizes the ironic discussion among Raskolnikov and Zametov to reveal Raskolnikov’s duality and also the mental illness brought about by crime. In the bar, after asking Zametov insane queries relating to the murder, Raskolnikov asks him, “And what if it was I who murdered the old lady?” This is ironic simply because Zametov has no clue that Raskolnikov committed the murder, and now Raskolnikov dangers becoming caught to release his details. Dostoevsky uses this irony to show that guilt is causing excellent pain in Raskolnikov, creating the require to confess in him. This also strengthens the battle of duality inside Raskolnikov and creates massive suspense for the finish of the novel.

An additional critical ironic occasion is Nikolay’s confession of the murder. Porifry is battling Raskolnikov and has him on the verge of confessing when Nikolay bursts in the space and shouts, “I am guilty… I am the murderer!” Dostoevsky therefore creates suspense and makes it possible for Raskolnikov time to prepare for his confession by speaking with Dounia and Sonia. Otherwise, Raskolnikov would have confessed and would in no way have been reformed. Also, Raskolnikov shows no guilt for Nikolay’s confession, additional revealing the domination of the evil side of Raskolnikov.

Irony is present in the conversation among Sonia and Raskolnikov in Component 4, Chapter 4. In this scene Raskolnikov verbally attacks Sonia for her religious beliefs, calling her “crazy”, suggesting suicide, and stating, “But maybe there is no God at all.” This example of verbal irony shows that Raskolnikov is deeply troubled, as earlier he decided against suicide, and he is typically characterized as “crazy.” However, he is intrigued at her strong believes and begins to ask her about the killing of the pawnbroker and Lizaveta. He explains to her that he has “broken with (his household) fully.” This dramatic irony confuses Sonia, for she is unaware that Raskolnikov is the killer. However, it is employed by Dostoevsky to allow Raskolnikov to realize that Sonia is a forgiving individual and create and interest in Sonia’s religion. This leads to Raskolnikov’s confession and also to his conversion to Christianity.

Next, Dostoevsky uses irony in Svidriagaiolov’s description of his enjoy for Dounia to reveal his message that companionship is an important aspect of life. Svidrigailov explains his really like for Dounia, and ironically his description parallels Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia. The distinction in between Svidriagailov’s partnership with Dounia and Raskolnikov’s relationship with Sonia is that Dounia is repulsed by Svidrigailov. As a result, Svidriagailov commits suicide, dying abandoned and alone, while Raskolnikov lives. If Dounia loved Svidriagailov, he would not have committed suicide. Likewise, if Sonia abandoned Raskolnikov, he would have killed himself. This contrast in resolutions show that companionship can be a deciding factor in one’s life, and that the enjoy of other folks is vital.

Irony plays a tremendous part in the resolution of Raskolnikov’s confession. As he walks to the police department to confess, he hears that “Svidrigailov has shot himself.” Svidrigailov was the only particular person who knew of Raskolnikov’s crime, so now Raskolnikov could stroll away and be residence free of charge. His dark side forces him to turn away from the police division, only to see Sonia standing at the door. Raskolnikov then turns about and confesses, showing the dominance of his type, warm side which wants Sonia’s enjoy. However, the conflict in between Raskolnikov’s duality is not more than, as he confesses only for Sonia, and not simply because he believes what he did was wrong. Despite this, the confession is a large step towards Raskolnikov’s conversion.

Raskolnikov is then sentenced for only seven years, due to an ironic conviction primarily based on “his abnormal mental situation,” and his term in Siberia, where the most essential turning point of the novel happens. Raskolnikov is bitter in jail, tortured by the other folks for his disbelief in God, and rude to Sounia when she would check out. Ironically, Raskolnikov’s attitude shifts when he dreams of a globe that “was condemned to a terrible new strange plague,” caused by everyone believing his theory was appropriate. This concept represented Raskolnikov’s believing his theory was right, and it awakened him to the wrongness of it. Finally, the caring, good side of Raskolnikov defeats his evil side, as he turns to a life of Christianity with Sonia. Dostoevsky also makes use of this ironic dream to criticize abstract theories and their devastating impacts.

Crime and Punishment is the story of the battle between Raskolnikov’s intellectual arrogance and his conscience. He continually attempts to run from his conscience but he can’t escape it. Ironic events force Raskolnikov to face the conflict and eventually determine his destiny. Dostoevsky makes use of this device to clarify the complex conflict raging inside Raskolnikov, and in turn to reveal his message about mankind: that any individual via the acceptance of guilt and suffering can be reformed. Although Raskolnikov commits murder, by means of his guilt and the really like of others towards him, he is saved.
What are you waiting for?
Thousands of students choose us!
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you want a paper on this sample, we’ll created new for you.

Order Now

Order Now