Close

SPECIAL OFFER FOR OUR CLIENTS! CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: FIRST5

Disclaimer: This essay is not an example of the work done by the EssayPay© service. Samples of our experts work can be found here. All opinions and conclusions belong to the authors, who sent us this essay.
If you want to pay for essay for unique writing Analysis of Albert Camus’ Writing Style, just click Order button. We will write a custom essay on Analysis of Albert Camus’ Writing Style specifically for you!

Analysis of Albert Camus’ Writing Style

Most of Albert Camus’ writings concentrate on the philosophy of the Absurd. His primary character in the novel, The Stranger exemplifies what an absurd man is and his essay The Myth of Sisyphus takes readers by way of his reasoning for his belief and the conclusion that he reaches. Camus’ philosophy of life in his opinion is that life has no which means considering that there is an endless circular path of meaning that can only be ended with suicide. By this, he implies that if someone had been to discover a which means to live that individual would eventually lose that explanation to reside and would have to make a decision. This is whether or not to commit suicide or to try to uncover one more meaning. The only finish to this cycle is death or preemptively ending it would be suicide. Camus’ believes that the absurd is irrational in its type. Camus also shows that absurdity is an unstoppable force. The absurd also does not consider or contemplate the future with its actions. Subsequent, the circular argument of the which means of life has only two choices to stick to. Also, Camus describes the absurdity that is man’s relation to time. Finally Camus sees suicide as a response to the absurdity of life. Camus believes that the universe acts irrationally or absurdly. As stated by Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray, “The absurd, for Camus, has two sources: the universe and death. The 1st is the notion that absurdity lies in the chaos and irrationality of the universe” (Baltzer-Jaray) The universe could abide by its laws however, it does act irrationally in certain situations. It does not rationalize events such as a human will. If a soldier is captured as a prisoner of war and succumbs to brutal torture at the hands of enemies. That soldier would take into account that scenario absurd. What necessity was there for him to be tortured as a prisoner of war. 1 could clarify that the enemy preferred intel to advantage themselves even so, the soldier would not be so willing to forgive the awful remedy he received and would consider the event absurd. Camus explains this as the universe acting irrationally. Just as the absurd is irrational and unpredictable, the absurd is also unstoppable in its effects. Camus considers absurdity to not take into account the future, The absurd does not cease and wonder if what it does now will affect what may occur in the future. Camus’ major character in the novel The Stranger exemplifies absurdity. Meursault does not act in preparation for future events. As stated by Dilek Baskaya in his essay, “Another peculiarity of Meursault that tends to make him absurd is that he perceives and lives in only the present time whereas in a society men and women are anticipated to have the concept of all three phases of time” (Baskaya). He mentions that as a society men and women take into account all 3 phases of time: past, present, and future. People will take into account previous errors and work to not make them once again, they will take into account what is happening in the present and program accordingly, and people will prepare for their future with a retirement fund. Meursault does not believe in terms of past or the future, he only considers what is taking place in the moment. Throughout the novel he never plans any activities with people. He just agrees to any that are proposed to him. The novel follows his thoughts and the novel seldom mentions how his previous has impacted the present or will affect the future. He seldom ever thinks twice about his actions such as his murder of a man. There was hardly any time for consideration amongst the time that Meursault sees the Arab man and the moment he kills him. Meursault is not thinking rationally throughout this moment, but absurdly. The absurdity that Camus is trying to describe is shown in Meursault’s trial. Any sane human would try to defend their case as to be acquitted or acquire the least serious punishment attainable. This kind of pondering is not what Meursault does. Rather of defending himself he remains silent and show tiny to no emotion just as he did as his mother’s funeral. The prosecutor even utilizes this against him in the course of his trial, ‘I accuse the prisoner of behaving at his mother’s funeral in a way that showed he was currently a criminal at heart’ (Camus 60). Meursault’s absurd way of thinking is demonstrated throughout his trial with his attitude and responses. The entire point of the defendant’s testimony is to defend your reasons for committing the crime to the greatest of your capacity nevertheless, Meursault does not take advantage of this opportunity completely to explain himself to the jury. Despite the fact that Camus believed that absurdity was present in every thing he believes that there is an finish to life. This finish that Camus comes to discover is death. 1 of philosophy’s greatest concerns, “To be, or not to be.” Camus believes that each human desires to discover the which means of life to feel a sense of objective and determination. This meaning to life is what motivates people to strive in whatever they do, whether or not that be teaching, healing folks, or constructing buildings. Without this which means humans shed sight on what to operate towards. Camus believes that there is no meaning to life. He explains that life boils down to a circular argument that can only finish with death. In Camus’ “The Myth of Sisyphus,” he states, “in a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels alien, a stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a lost house or the hope of a promised land” (Camus 497). Camus explains that when the universe becomes transparent man experiences an exile and there there appears to be no hope of a better future such as heaven. This is when man is faced with Camus’ proposed choice to end it now or continue on the circular never ending path until death. Camus also sees irrational way of pondering when a man thinks about his position in time. Camus describes the depending and the putting of our hope in tomorrow as absurd. As young children we often want that we can be older or as adults we desire to retire to so that we can quit laboring. Camus states, “He belongs to time, and by the horror that seizes him, he recognizes his worst enemy. Tomorrow, he was longing for tomorrow, whereas everything in him ought to reject it” (Camus 503). Camus realizes that tomorrow is not what humans ought to be living for due to the fact it will in no way stop until it is too late. When you are at your deathbed, you will realize that tomorrow is not what you should hope for. Why need to men and women desire to reach their death quicker? Camus explains that this realization is absurd given that it is ridiculous to extended for a time that is closer to death. Men and women are supposed to fear death and the uncertainty that is associated with it not extended for it. Camus also explains that suicide is not just the finish of the circular path. Camus interprets the act of committing suicide as a confession of defeat. Man contemplates suicide simply because he can not continue and he does not possess the strength essential to continue. As stated in an write-up by Ronald Aronson, “Camus sees this question of suicide as a organic response to an underlying premise, namely that life is absurd in a selection of ways” (Aronson). Suicide is caused by the absurdity in life and our inability to deal with it. A man who loses each loved 1 sees his situation as absurd so he commits suicide to escape the absurdity and the circular path of life that Camus describes. A lady who loses her youngsters to the horrors of war will see the predicament as absurd and have the decision to make no matter whether or not to continue on the circular path. Camus’ opinion is intriguing in that everybody can recognize the message he is attempting to convey. It is a simplified version of whether or not or not to reside in this absurd reality that we inhabit. Men and women contemplate suicide since life is absurd and we cannot uncover meaning in life via the absurdity. Camus’ philosophy on suicide and the absurd is accurate yet not very complex. You stick to a path until you drop that which means for living, generally due to absurd, then you you have to make a option to discover meaning or commit suicide. This choice is explained to be pointless considering that everyone’s life ends with death. This is due either to committing suicide, dying of old age, or becoming killed. Camus 1st explains the absurd as irrational and unpredictable. Then, he explains that the absurd is not anything that can be stopped or slowed down. Next, he explains that the absurdity does not act in respect to the future. In addition, Camus explains his circular path of life that only ends on of two methods. Furthermore, Camus describes man’s obsession with the future as absurd. Lastly, Camus explains that suicide is not only the giving up on life but also as a final response to the absurdity of life. Camus’ philosophy of the absurd is impossible to comprehend totally without having actually possessing contemplated suicide as soon as in your life.

Calculate your price
Pages
What are you waiting for?
Thousands of students choose us!
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you want a paper on this sample, we’ll created new for you.

Order Now

Order Now