Close

SPECIAL OFFER FOR OUR CLIENTS! CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: CLICK TO ORDER WITH 5% DISCOUNT: FIRST5

Published: 24-12-2019

121 writers online

Disclaimer: This essay is not an example of the work done by the EssayPay© service. Samples of our experts work can be found here. All opinions and conclusions belong to the authors, who sent us this essay.
If you want to pay for essay for unique writing Yo Soy Cuba, just click Order button. We will write a custom essay on Yo Soy Cuba specifically for you!

Yo Soy Cuba

Crying foul on director Mikhail Kalatozov’s deliriously unhinged, masterful slice of post-Bay of Pigs agitprop for its unapologetic commitment to ideology would be tantamount to artistic heresy and shortsighted emphasis on the political over the artistic if the film weren’t such a bold and brazen reclamation of that age old fact that art is innately political no matter what.

Plunging into the revelry of fantastical space as obviously euphoric as Lang’s Metropolis city was demonic, and as bodaciously animated as Lang’s vision to boot, Yo Soy Cuba is an aesthetic vision primarily. But with these aesthetics, the proof is in the proverbial politics to start with. Separating this far-out vision of a largely fictive representation of Cuban life from its animated muse – its Soviet morality – is at some level impossible: like Eisenstein’s utilization of montage to stage suggestions of collective conflict, cinematographer Sergei Urusevsky’s aesthetic revolutions aren’t apolitical.

Yo Soy Cuba is a vivacious workout, a Communist high palpably star-struck by the wave of political revolution it presumed (or hoped) was on the horizon, a film bathed in all the passions genuine belief can muster, and a work that marshals an unmediated , even crazed help for Cuban life into a catalyst for unbridled cinematic experimentation positively operating wild with screw-loose charisma.

Revolutionary cinema, Yo Soy Cuba isn’t merely a narrative of communist propaganda or a neutered, neutral-styled narrative of social upheaval that still caters (like almost all politically “radical” American films) to the broadly individualistic cinematic style it purports to redress. Alternatively, Cuba is a unilaterally adventurous, fiercely aestheticized, stylistically contentious rebuttal to the staid capitalist style of production-line American cinema. It is a glove to the face of not only American politics but American film, weaving in between and fluidly intermingling folks, locations, and objects without privileging any in a distinctly anti-capitalist milieu. Wryly anthropomorphizing the angry island itself with a deadpan melodrama voiceover from the island’s point of view (a voice that cheekily pays homage to Columbus and then throws him to the wolves inside seconds) is an early key-in to the film’s wish to explore space rather than just depict it like most Hollywood images. From there, the luxuriant whirlpool of mise-en-scene and cinematography suggests a subjective, revisable sense of place that defies and defeats Hollywood understandings of a steady world sitting by so only folks can focus our consideration. The camera exhibits a runner’s high, except it doesn’t run so significantly as glide and saunter by way of a locale it observes like the camera is one of the island’s limbs.

Ultimately, the ever-motile camera adopts a rapturous search for new meaning a lot more akin to a documentary’s active, present-tense quest to brave the unexplored caverns of the planet with every shot.In contrast to most American films, exactly where locations and material products are background props – manufactured objects utilized only for protagonists to conquer or otherwise pay no focus to – the frames of Yo Soy Cuba cannot so effortlessly be compartmentalized into “focus” and “backdrop”. The camera does not center lone folks, individualized in the frame as foregrounded subjects for whom the rest of the world is merely an obstacle to triumph (therefore feeding into the Western liberalist logic of individualism). Rather, Kalatozov comingles not only individual stories of distinct individuals but interweaves folks with environment in deep-focus shots to tie humanity to the land and people to their broader social contexts, to the collective. In contrast to the hyper-directed, linear, pseudo-objective Western film style of America at the time, Cuba borrows French poetic realism and German Expressionism along with Soviet realism to brew up a reflexive, subjective head-space exactly where people are if not one with the globe at least portion of it rather than totems who rise above it the way the camera flows between people and moments is a visual approximation, in spirit, of that oft-unclarifiable idea of “collective consciousness” trumpeted by leftist scholars.

Like the early Soviet epics of the ‘20s, Yo Soy Cuba is fiercely reticent to accept the American narrativization of cinema rather than wrapping around the globe of an individual in conflict, the film shifts with nearly free-wheeling, baroque abandon in between stories and angles to recommend, like Eisenstein, that the world is also messy and bedeviling to be compartmentalized into a concise narrative of personal, individual psychology and progress.
Calculate your price
Pages
What are you waiting for?
Thousands of students choose us!
close

Sorry, copying is not allowed on our website. If you want a paper on this sample, we’ll created new for you.

Order Now

Order Now