Battle Of Algiers Analysis Essay

Pontecorvo’s movie about anti-imperialist resistance in the African Revolution inspired some audiences with ideas about challenging political regimes, the outcome that made a great deal of conflict in the 1960s. Screenings for The action of Algiers were frequently perceived as fostering national conflict and offering tactical messages for revolutionaries. This movie was initially banned in France, while in the United States this Algerian conflict was likened with the dark liberation conflict and the activities of the African Panther Party. Bosley Crowther, the movie critic of the New York Times, saw the relation with these protests of African Americans. “ Basically, this idea is one of bravery, ” wrote Crowther, “ —the bravery of people who struggle for liberation from economic and political persecution. And that being then, one may feel the person in what goes on in this image to what has occurred in the black ghettos of some of our American cities recently. ” 2
[...]
It’s called that “ action of Algiers, ” when I wrote this novel and this movie and it’s that “ Battle of Algiers ” at quotation marks because this was no Battle. The fight is Napoleonic, where you have armies with same weapons. This was one line with the knife and the other side with a very large weapon. I’m starting to tell you why I named it this action of Algiers. Why did I call it the action of Algiers when you take a real un-battle-like action? Around 3 or 4 years ago I was here and the professor asked me the subject. I said, well, was it the fight?
[...]
I’m starting to tell you why I named it this action of Algiers. Why did I call it the action of Algiers when you take a real un-battle-like action? Around 3 or 4 years ago I was here and the professor asked me the subject. I said, well, was it the fight? Yes, really it was because if France had won this battle it could have never forgotten Algeria, but because we won in having them to get, on body, it became a battle.
[...]