Global Perspectives Individual Report

The subject I have chosen for my IGCSE International Perspectives Element#1 is Digital Planet. The sphere that I am highlighting below this subject is “have technological advancements reached a limit by which they can be known as harmful”. The explanation why I have selected this topic is due to the fact in recent years, critics worldwide have raised arguments on the reliability of the role of technologies in the life of the average human.

The progression of new technologies has been taking place because the beginning of human history. From the invention of items like the knives and spears produced out of rocks and sticks for killing animals for food, to contraptions like the 1st printing press and the personal computer.

The advancement in technology has been remarkably fast in the 20th and 21st century. With electronic technology and machines being created and enhanced all the time, it was most probable that along with the optimistic attributes of these new advancements, people would also think about a crucial analytical strategy of the negative aspects of new technology.

Every day miscellaneous companies manufacture some thing a lot more sophisticated in an attempt to win the customer war against another organization. This consumerism is compelling the rate of advancement much more quickly each year. The creation of the iPhone by Apple is an example of this. All of a sudden men and women could contact, text, browse the world wide web, listen to music, watch videos and click photographs all in 1 place. No other cell-telephone business in marketplace could compare to it. This was undoubtedly a good, seeing that men and women could use the telephone to retailer information for work, education, entertainment. But it was only a matter of realization prior to the unfavorable claims started as well too pricey, swift battery energy loss and could a device like this cease face to face communication all collectively-to name just a handful of claims.

Technologies will always have adverse elements due to the fact it depends on what the purpose of the technology is and who is generating use it Albert Einstein after said “Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal”. [1]

A single of the greatest adverse claims observed on past years was against the advancement of gaming technologies. A video game referred to as Grand Theft Auto was released in October 1997. The game was based on violence. It incorporated stealing cars, killing and hurting random people, to far more offensive content material like the prostitute characters. Computer games were cast aspersions on after an incident in the USA with a teenage boy who shot at two policemen and a dispatcher, killing them in 2003. He had after before been brought to the police station on suspicion of driving a stolen car, which is one thing that repeatedly happens in the game series.

The media described the incident in such a way “Lawsuit: “Grand Theft Auto” Led Teen to Kill”. [two] Predictably, the blame was levied on the technologies and the organizations who produced the game. “What has occurred in Alabama is that 4 companies participated in the coaching of Devin … to kill 3 men”.[3] This type of media interest can be observed to help the negative claims produced by Jacques Ellul, a French sociologist. He viewed “technology as an irresistible, mysterious force” [four] he continued in calling it “menacing” [five] and “has an capability to alter each and every aspect of life that it encounters” [6]. Concerned authorities had been inspecting how the game was altering and disrupting the young boy’s life, they quoted him to have mentioned “Lifeis a video game. You’ve got to die sometime”.[7] This depicted how this technology has twisted the boy’s mental state and changed his outlook on life itself, that it is nothing but a game. The technologies has taken more than the boy and controlled him into committing such an act of violence. Ellul also described technologies as “some kind of living breathing monster, out of control” [eight]