The three levels of the leadership model

With the ever-changing societal and operate environments, there is a continuous require for people, who maintain leadership positions, to verify their leadership models. Therefore, myriad leadership models abound in an try to motivate and guide folks. Nevertheless, it should be noted that not all leadership models and theories are efficient. For a thorough understanding of the effective leadership model, it is important to recap the offered leadership models. Scholars advanced ten main leadership models that incorporate situational leadership, servant leadership, Blake and Mouton’s leadership grid, emotional intelligence, Kouzes and Posner’s leadership model, level five leadership, the develop model, genuine leadership, six leadership passages, and the diamond model of leadership. These leadership models advance different models that leaders can adopt in order to make certain the achievement of their groups or organizations. Even so, an owner of an industrial organization located in West Virginia needs a lot more than what has been advanced in the aforementioned leadership models to be an successful leader. Hence, three levels of leadership model abound as the powerful leadership model will help activity of the owner of an industrial company. The effectiveness of this model denotes the truth that it facilitates a leader to develop his or her technical and psychological viewpoint relating to the task. In addition, the theory comprises of levels that address various aspects of leadership that are private, public and personal leadership.

This essay explores the 3 levels model of leadership as an effective leadership model and mentions the theories that help and fall short against the ideals sophisticated by this theory.

Overview of the 3 Levels of Leadership Model

The 3 levels of leadership model is a more recent created theory that seeks to address the shortcomings of earlier models of leadership. This theory also incorporates the strengths of the earlier models of leadership, which make it to stand out as the very best model of leadership. Research by Cole (2004) asserts that the 3 levels of leadership model is a model that can be regarded as practical in nature as it avails practical guidance that can facilitate the improvement of leadership presence, skill, and knowhow. Notably, the model offers a summary concerning what leaders need to incoporate in their practice in order for their groups to feel their leadership. At the same time, it offers space for improvement technically and psychologically. It need to also be noted that the theory offers a foundation for leaders who want to incoporate the ideals of genuine leadership and servant leadership at the same time. Thus, in order to establish the effectiveness of the three levels of leadership model, it is important to explore the levels inherent, which contain public, private, and personal leadership. An understanding of the diagram representation of the model is vital in understanding the functioning of the model. According to Gill (2012), the model in a diagram comprises of a circle that has three concentric circles with individual leadership situated in the center. The circle also has 4-outwardly directed arrows.

Private and Public Leadership

Private and public leadership appear on the outer levels of the circles. Study by Northouse (2012) indicates that they represent the behavioral levels. Notably, there is a distinction amongst public and private leadership. Public leadership comprises of the behaviors that a particular person in a leadership position has to posses or practice in order to be able to influence two or a lot more folks. This is vital for an industrial company owner who has numerous people functioning under him because with no influencing the worker’s behavior, the organization is probably to stall or take a downward trend in terms of inputs. Public leadership is distinguished from private 1, taking into consideration the fact that private leadership entails the behavior required of a manager or leader to be able to choose and influence workers one particular on a single. This is also substantial for an industrial provide company owner simply because it is critical that one knows all his or her staff a single by one particular. This is also important in determining the employees’ weaknesses. Therefore, the cause for selecting them and influencing them one by a single. This is an idea that many preceding leadership models failed to mention, and it is crucial to the improvement of an organization or company. Hence, it is also important to note that 34 “public behaviors” are outlined that ensure a leader stays on his great behavior in such a situation in order to motivate workers. Public leadership advances actions that must be undertaken, which avail 3 benefits. The advantages consist of the truth that it helps in setting and concentrating on a vision that is motivating, which is vital in making sure unity of goal. Secondly, public leadership cultivates good peer pressure that are essential in group spirit and the development of trust. Lastly, public leadership results in productive collective action. The 34 talked about public behaviors are grouped into five classes thet consist of group building and upkeep that comprises of 12 behaviors, vision setting comprising of 4 behaviors, and dilemma solving comprising of ten behaviors. Organizing and execution comprise of two and six behaviors respectively.

In this context, private leadership is crucial basing on the truth that despite a firm or organization denoting sense of group unity, they nevertheless comprise of people who do not share the identical psychological make-up, experience, ambitions, and self-assurance. Thus, this explains the goal of private leadership in an industrial supply company as individuals can be treated as folks in order to motivate them in locations that they are not fulfilling. The 14 behaviors under private leadership are grouped into two classes, which include person goal and activity that comprises of five behaviors amongst them appraising, disciplining, and selecting. The remaining nine behaviors are under person creating and maintenance that include a behavior such as the recognition of a rising talent. It should be noted that both private and public leadership give credence to individual leadership. This abounds from the reality that personal leadership contributes to a person’s widening of his or her repertoire of public leadership behavior while, at the identical time, it is vital to be familiar that private leadership can contribute to avoidance behavior, which benefits due to negative self image or lack of ability. Thus, it is crucial that a leader factors personal leadership for purposes of escalating his one-on-one expertise and eradicate interpersonal fears.

Personal Leadership

Individual leadership plays a critical part in the functioning of public and private leadership. This abounds from the fact that it addresses the leader’s moral, technical, and pssychological improvement, which have a great impact on the leader’s behavior, leadership presence and talent. As a result, it can be concluded that individual leadership has a fantastic influence on a person’s inner development, and it is vital that a particular person to advance great leadership. Individual leadership comprises of 3 aspects that contain psychological self mastery, technical talent, and correct attitude towards people. Notably, the 1st element of individual leadership facilitates the understanding of personal weakness ad aids one particular to function on the noticed weakness. According to Northouse (2012), leaders want to have a knowhow in time management, group psychology, and person psychology. In addition, a number of abilities help the private and public leadership behaviors such as setting ambitions, solving issues, group processes management, and creating group decisions. The second element of individual leadership is also important for an industrial provide company leader as it faciliattes him to have the right attitude to other individuals. Notably, this works towards having respect for oneself and other folks and upholding equality. Gill (2012) advances several factors that add up to appropriate attitude and these contain balance, interdependence, service, and appreciation. Self-mastery is the third element of private leadership and essential for an industrial provide leader due to the fact it promotes a flexible command and, at the exact same time, emphasizing self-awareness. These two traits are vital for a leader that seeks to develop as they facilitate a connection with one’s values (Northouse, 2012).

The merit of this leadership model gives a good definition of leadership presence, which deviates from the prior belief regarding the same. The previous models believed that a leader can get his or her presence by means of projection of a feeling of specialness by workers, job title, skillful acting, and fame (Cole, 2004). However, basing on the three levels of leadership model, a genuine leadership presence emanates from seven aspects that include inner peace of mind and fulfillment, private energy, high and genuine self-esteem, desire to grow via learning, intuition, depiction of a sense of purpose and capability to keep in the present.

Theories Incorporated into the Model

The 3 levels of leadership theory incorporate several theories. It borrows some tips from these theories in order to come up with its full premise. For instance, the three level of leadership model borrows from the 5 practices of exemplary leadership model that avails 5 facets, which contribute to great leadership. These components consist of inspiring a shared vision, difficult the procedure, facilitating other people to act, modelling the way, and encouraging the heart. From a closer appear at the three levels of leadership model, it has borrowed from the aforementioned leadership model problems of personal motivation and motivating other people to act. It also touches on modelling the way by means of its indication that personal leadership is a essential for group’s accomplishment as it eliminates barriers related with private and public leadership.

An additional theory incorporated in the 3 levels of leadership theory involves the connection theories also known as transformational theories (Cole, 2004). These theories concentrate on the relationship that final results among a leader and the workers or followers. Same applies to the three levels of leadership model that asks leaders to kind very good attitude and partnership towards their followers. Notably, the 3 levels of leadership model borrows from partnership theories that advance for leaders to make sure that each and every individual completes his or her task in spite of the group been focussed on the collective goal (Lussier & Achua, 2009).

Theories not Incorporated into the Model

A number of theories have not been incorporated into this leadership model. Even so, it is vital to mention that the 3 levels of leadership model works towards addressing them. These theories consist of functional theories, traits theory and situational/ contingency theories. Firstly, functional and contingency theories are not incorporated into the model simply because they ignore leadership presence and people’s manage of psychology. In addition, Gill (2012) affirms that situational/ contigency theory and functional theory assume that people can modify behavior at will to suit conditions, and leaders can adopt desired behaviors right after coaching, which is not entirely true. Lastly, traits theory is not incoporated into the model because it advances that traits play a essential part in buiding establishing of leaders, to which the three levels of leadership model does not subscribe. In addition, traits theory advances that leaders have certain traits, but it fails to capture the precise types of traits that leaders possess (Goleman, 2000).

In conclusion, a variety of leadership models have been advanced in an attempt to motivate and guide leaders and those aspiring to get into leadership positions. Nonetheless, not all the models and theories sophisticated have the full specifications for making an effective leader. Some theories and models do not share what is widely accepted as the general truth concerning leaders. For instance, the traits theory states that leaders possess specific traits that not every person has. This is not totally true as folks are not born leaders. Thus, the three levels of leadership model has been advanced as the best model for effective leadership. The model comprises of 3 levels that facilitate efficient leadership such as personal, private, and public leadership. Private leadership gives much credence to private and public leadership as it promotes peace, which is important in handling other people and dealing with individual difficulties. Notably, some theories have been incorporated into this model and these incorporate relationship and the five practices of exemplary leadership. At the identical time, it is established that some theories have not been incorporated in the three models of leadership model despite the fact that it has tried to cover up for their limititations. These incorporate theories such as traits theory, situational/ contigency theory and functional theory. The elimination of these theories into the three levels of leadership model is proved by the fact that they do not recognize leadership presence. In addition to, traits theory advances that leaders have particular traits, but it fails to capture the precise sorts of traits that leaders possess.